For the Conservation Curious

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Killing an Endangered Rhino IS NOT Conservation January 16, 2014

Filed under: Science — newdomino @ 1:15 PM
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

This topic has been covered well in the media this week, so I was hesitant to throw my thoughts out into the blogosphere too, but the subject matter makes my skin crawl so much that I had to go ahead and write about it: the auction by a hunt club in Texas to give the highest bidder a chance to kill an ENDANGERED black rhino in Namibia.

rhino_wikipedia

Where do I begin? First of all, according to a blog posting on National Geographic’s website, this is only one of five rhino permits that the Namibian government will hand out this year. So not only is one ENDANGERED rhino facing its death, but many will! This is a species that numbers less than 2,000 animals in the country, a population crash of nearly 96 percent over the last century. How few individuals does a species have to have in order for all hunting of it to cease?

Illegal poaching for the rhino’s horn, which is used in traditional Chinese medicine, kills numerous individual animals too. Supporters of the hunt say that the $350,000 raised by the auction will go to protect the other rhinos from poachers. It’s all about conservation, they say. Bullshit is what I say! If these people truly cared about conservation, and not the need to kill something to show what a man they are, and put a rhino head on their wall, they would donate to conservation organizations that work in Africa to create new parks and reserves and to hire additional rhino guards to protect them from poachers. They would not put their money where their gun is. Using the word conservation in this context is just disgusting to me.

And don’t think that I am some ultra-liberal animal rights activist here, who is against all forms of hunting. I am not. I used to be, but as I have educated myself about hunting and the environment, I certainly see its place – at times. Humans have altered the natural landscape so much through the killing of predators like wolves and mountain lions, along with creating the perfect habitat for nuisance species like Canada geese and white-tailed deer, that hunting is one of the few viable options left. If people didn’t hunt deer, our forests would never regenerate trees, except for perhaps some invasive ones. So I support hunting where it keeps the ecological web in check. That is not the case with the rhino hunt.

We are talking about a species under threat from many angles. The black rhino is ENDANGERED, which means it’s on its way to being EXTINCT. That means it is gone for good. I may never see a rhino in Africa although I hope to!), but that makes the species no less precious to me. I can’t travel to Namibia right now and watch the rhinos like a hawk to make sure no one guns them down, but I can use my keyboard and the internet to spread the word. What this hunt represents IS NOT conservation, no matter how they spin it.

I will leave you with a very apropos quote from John Muir, founder of the Sierra Club, “Take only pictures, leave only footprints,” not take only trophies, leave only shell casings!

 

4 Responses to “Killing an Endangered Rhino IS NOT Conservation”

  1. The best thing that can happen to a species to ensure its long-term survival is to be fortunate to have sportsmen – hunters or fisherman – take a deep, vested interested in it. This has been proven again and again in modern times where hunting and fishing policy is guided by science. Hunters and fisherman are able to bring to bear the economic resources and political will wild species and their environments need for their survival.
    Specific to this rhino hunt: Current policy is not working very well. Let’s concede that. The rhinos being selected for this limit hunt are old, non-breeding specimens. They are precisely the individuals that should be culled to ensure the overall health of the herd.

    • newdomino Says:

      Thanks for your comment. While I don’t agree with everything you said I DO agree that sportsmen and women have played a role in conservation and will continue to do so. But I highly disagree with the hunting of ANY endangered animal, whether it is “old” or not. Just my opinion, but there it is. If this rhino isn’t breeding, it doesn’t have an impact in the health of the herd, aside from possibly eating some vegetation a younger male might otherwise have eaten. My two cents. Thanks.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 603 other followers